Ledge
Solutions
By workflow
Working papers
Flux analysis
Close Orchestration
Journal entries
Account reconciliation
Cash application
Payment reconciliation
By role
CFO
Controller
Finance team
Engineering & Product
Operations
See all roles
By industry
B2B
B2C
SaaS
Fintech
Marketplace
Vertical SaaS
Integrations
Connect your
Banks
Payment Service Providers
ERPs
Billing Systems
Databases
CSVs & Files
See all integrations
Resources
Categories
Articles
Webinars
Reports
Case studies
Guides
All resources
Statistics on AI usage in accounting (2026 data)

Explore the latest statistics on AI usage in accounting, including adoption trends, measurable use cases, governance challenges, and what finance leaders should know in 2026.

Read the full Report
Pricing
Company
Careers
About Us
Book a demo
burger openmenu btn close
Back

Tips for accountants tasked with reviewing AI-generated work

Ritika Strauss
//
Published:
August 17, 2026
//
Updated:
October 19, 2026
Article
Download report (PDF)

Ritika Strauss

, Author
No items found.

With a background in data science and content strategy, Ritika has been working in the AI industry since 2013 prior to the commercialization of GenAI. She is a communication practitioner and rising Responsible AI leader with deep experience building educational content for finance professionals, policy experts, legal teams, and highly technical leaders. At Ledge, she works closely with the team to understand how accounting leaders are making sense of AI, fact or fiction.

Company name

About the company

In this article:
Why we founded Ledge
Share this article

Get our best content in your inbox!

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Meet Ledge at SuiteWorld 2026
Book a meeting

If your manager or team lead is asking you to spend less time preparing reconciliations, journal entries  and other month-end close tasks, and more time reviewing AI-generated work, you may be wondering what this means for your role.

The goal is to expand your team's capabilities, building on the accounting knowledge, skills and judgment you already bring to your work. Still, the transition may not feel easy. Moving from preparing the work yourself to reviewing what AI has prepared requires a different way of thinking, and there's a learning curve. You'll need to develop confidence in knowing what to check, when to investigate further and when there's enough evidence to approve the result.

Developing that confidence takes time and practice. You should continue to question AI-generated outputs, examine the details and apply your professional judgment. The difference is in how you use those skills as more of the preparation work becomes automated.

The following guidance is written for accountants making this transition, with practical tips for reviewing and approving AI-generated work responsibly. If you're an accounting manager or team lead, you can share this articledirectly with your team to help them quickly ramp on their review skills.

Recognize that reviewing is a different skill than preparing

When you prepare a reconciliation, journal entry or working paper yourself, you follow the process from beginning to end. You gather the source data, perform calculations, apply accounting rules and confirm that the numbers tie out.

When AI handles the preparation, you're starting with a completed output. Your job is to evaluate whether the result is accurate, reasonable and supported by evidence.

That means asking questions such as:

  • Does the result make sense given what happened in the business?
  • Is the underlying data complete and reliable?
  • Were the appropriate accounting policies and procedures followed?
  • Are there unusual transactions or unexpected changes that need a closer look?
  • Is there enough supporting evidence to approve the work?
  • Are there unresolved issues that require further investigation or escalation?

As you get familiar with reviewing AI-generated work, draw on your experience preparing similar tasks. Think about the checks you would normally perform, the errors you've encountered and the information you would need to feel confident in the result.

Your preparation experience gives you a valuable foundation for reviewing. The skill you're developing is knowing how to apply that knowledge to work you didn't prepare yourself.

Start with familiar, lower-risk work

When you're first learning to review AI-generated work, start with accounting processes you already know well. Familiarity gives you a useful point of comparison. You know what the finished work should look like, which exceptions tend to come up and where mistakes are most likely to happen.

Good starting points include workflows that are:

  • Repetitive and well documented
  • Governed by clear accounting rules
  • Supported by reliable source data
  • Easy to check against existing records
  • Lower in value or financial risk
  • Already familiar to you

For example, you might start by reviewing a straightforward payment reconciliation, where you can verify matches against bank and processor records. As you gain experience, you can move toward more complex tasks involving estimates, unusual transactions or significant accounting judgment.

Starting with simpler work gives you a lower-risk environment to practice reviewing AI-generated outputs, investigate exceptions and build confidence in your decisions. The same standards for accuracy, documentation and approval still apply.

Know what to look for when reviewing AI-generated work

“Review the output” can feel like a vague instruction, especially when you're used to preparing the work yourself.

You might be tempted to perform a quick reasonableness check or, at the other extreme, redo the entire process manually to make sure nothing was missed. Neither approach gives you a complete picture of whether the work is ready for approval.

Before starting your review, make sure you understand:

  • Which data points and calculations need to be verified
  • What supporting documentation should be available
  • Which variances fall within acceptable thresholds
  • What types of exceptions require further investigation
  • When an item should be corrected, returned or escalated
  • What needs to be documented before approval
  • Which decisions require additional approval from a manager or controller

If your team's review expectations aren't clear, ask your manager or controller to walk you through them. Reviewing a few examples together can help you understand what a complete review looks like and how to handle situations that require judgment.

A structured review checklist can also help you build consistent habits. As you become more familiar with the workflow, you'll get better at recognizing which details need attention and when you have enough evidence to make a well-supported decision.

Focus on validating rather than recreating the work

When reviewing AI-generated work, your first instinct might be to redo the calculations yourself. That's understandable, especially when you're responsible for approving the result and want to make sure nothing was missed.

However, recreating every step manually defeats much of the purpose of automation. Instead, focus on verifying that the work was completed correctly and that the results are supported by reliable evidence.

Depending on the workflow, your review may include checking:

  • The source and completeness of the input data
  • The accounting rules and instructions applied by the AI system
  • Material changes from previous periods
  • Transactions that fall outside normal patterns
  • Exceptions identified by the system
  • Corrections or changes made after the initial review
  • Whether the final output agrees with its supporting documentation

Think of this as evaluating whether the process and its results are reliable. You may still need to recalculate specific amounts or investigate individual transactions, particularly when something looks unusual or involves significant judgment.

The goal is to direct your attention toward the areas that need verification, rather than automatically repeating work the system has already completed. Your organization's review and control requirements should guide how much independent checking is necessary.

Make sure you can trace the work back to its source

Before approving AI-generated work, you should be able to understand how the system reached its conclusion. That means having access to the underlying evidence, rather than receiving a final number without context.

For a proposed journal entry, that might include:

  • Source transactions, invoices, contracts or supporting files
  • Calculations, allocation methods and account mappings
  • Relevant accounting policies and assumptions
  • Similar entries from previous periods
  • Records of changes and prior approvals

Being able to trace an output back to its source makes it easier to investigate discrepancies, explain your decisions and support an audit. If important evidence is missing, request it before moving forward.

Learn from exceptions

Exceptions are opportunities to strengthen your accounting judgment. When something unusual appears, investigate what happened, why the system flagged it and whether the proposed treatment is appropriate.

Ask yourself whether the correct accounting rules were applied, whether additional business context is needed and how similar situations should be handled in the future.

Discuss unfamiliar exceptions with colleagues and share recurring issues with your team. Over time, this experience will help you recognize patterns, spot potential errors and identify opportunities to improve the workflow.

Build your skills and responsibilities gradually

You don't need to begin by independently approving complex accounting work. Start by comparing AI-generated outputs with previously completed work, reviewing routine transactions and documenting exceptions.

As you become more comfortable, you can progress toward making approval recommendations, handling more complex workflows and approving items within your authorized thresholds.

Continue strengthening your accounting fundamentals along the way. Review supporting calculations, study relevant policies and ask questions about how transactions affect the financial statements. Understanding how the work is prepared will make you a more effective reviewer.

Speak up and help improve the process

Your experience with day-to-day accounting work gives you valuable insight into where AI-assisted workflows may need improvement.

If you notice recurring errors, missing information or unclear assumptions, raise them with your team. You can help identify additional checks, suggest better rules and flag situations that require human judgment.

You should also feel comfortable questioning an AI-generated result, requesting additional evidence or escalating a concern. Your responsibility is to make a well-supported decision, even when that means pausing the workflow.

Adapt this guidance to your organization's needs

Every accounting team works  differently. The tips in this article is a starting point, and your review process should reflect your organization's accounting policies, internal controls, materiality thresholds and approval requirements.

Work with your manager or controller to understand what you're responsible for reviewing, what evidence you need and when to escalate an issue. Your organization's established procedures should always take precedence, and any changes to review practices should be evaluated by the appropriate accounting, audit or compliance advisors before implementation.

Moving toward a different kind of ownership

As AI takes on more repetitive preparation work, your accounting expertise becomes increasingly important in evaluating results, investigating exceptions and making informed decisions.

Building confidence in these responsibilities takes practice. With reliable evidence, clear review standards and opportunities to learn, you can develop the skills to review AI-generated work effectively while continuing to strengthen your accounting foundation.

‍

More resources

  • What to review before approving AI generated accounting work
  • How Ledge makes AI token costs predictable for accounting teams
  • When not using AI becomes the bigger accounting risk

Disclaimer: This content is provided for general educational and informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as accounting, financial, legal, tax, or other professional advice. Readers should consult their organization's internal subject matter experts and qualified professional advisors before making decisions based on this information. Any examples, estimates, or performance outcomes are illustrative only, and actual results will vary depending on an organization's specific circumstances, systems, controls, and implementation.

See how Ledge can help you execute your month-end close work

Set up a meeting with us to learn more and see a proof of concept

Book a demo
In this article:
Why we founded Ledge
Share this article
Ledge

We're on a mission to automate and simplify finance operations for teams working at scale.

Company

AboutContactDemoPricingCareersSecurity

Product

Working PapersFlux analysisClose OrchestrationJournal entriesAccount reconciliationCash applicationPayment reconciliationIntegrations

Industries

B2BB2CSaaSFintechMarketplaceVertical SaaS

Resources

All resourcesArticlesReportsGuidesWebinarsCase studies

Roles

CFOsControllersAR & BillingAccountingOperations

Compare

Ledge vs FloQastLedge vs BlackLineLedge vs NumericLedge vs ChatGPT

New York

60 Broad St, New York, United States 10004

Tel Aviv

Leonardo da Vinci St 14
Tel Aviv, Israel
6473118

© 2026 Ledge Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport Policy